Is there an objective morality

A whether or not we like it or are uncomfortable with it, is kind of irrelevant.The morality we use can't be objective until we are informed of the details of this objective morality that does exist.Even your question is subjective.Let's assume for the moment that there exists an objective morality.For an objective morality to be considered truly objective it must exist independently of our beliefs and perceptions of it.For morality to be objective, moral propositions such as killing is bad,stealing is bad, etc.

Morality, like other forms of technology, can result in competing, incompatible standards, each of which attempt to solve the same underlying social problems.One definition i read said that objective morality is the idea that a certain system of ethics or set of moral judgments is not just true according to a person's subjective opinion, but is absolutely and undeniably true for everyone..Objective morals values and duties do exist.The absence of objective morality.Laws are valid because they are politically objective:Which is not only an explanation of how moral judgement works, but an explanation of why the apparent conflict between objective and comparative.

A good analogy is a country's laws.And i am currently teaching an ethics course at a prison here in southern california.That gives it objectivity enough.